PDF
Keith Schulz
This article reviews United States democracy promotion efforts, and identifies
the different governmental and non-governmental bodies involved in these
efforts. The article focuses specifically on the efforts of the United
States Agency for International Development (USAID), the U.S. Governments
primary foreign assistance agency, which has been working in the area of
democracy and governance assistance for the past three decades. Finally,
the article will look at one specific area of democracy and governance
assistance legislative strengthening as an example of the specific
methods and approaches by which USAID implements its democracy and governance
assistance.
In Canada, the majority of democracy promotion funds are currently channeled
through the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA).1 By contrast,
a large number of different departments and agencies within the United
States government, and non-governmental organizations outside of the government,
contribute to U.S. democracy promotion efforts. This creates a complex,
and sometimes confusing and overlapping mandate, among the different departments,
agencies and organizations involved. This was not always the case. United
States support for democratic development began in earnest more than three
decades ago, first in certain countries in Latin America and then to support
democratic transitions in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union following
the collapse of communism. These early efforts were modest in scope and
objectives. U.S. Government democracy assistance funding in 1990 was little
more than $100 million. Today it is well over $ 1 billion per year with
a large percentage of that funding now going to democracy assistance efforts
in the Middle East and Asia.
Democracy Assistance goes Mainstream
Under the administration of President George W. Bush, the United States
made the support of freedom and democracy overseas a central foreign policy
focus. In his Second Inaugural address, President Bush announced that it
is the policy of the United States to seek and support the growth of democratic
movements and institutions in every nation and culture, with the ultimate
goal of ending tyranny in our world.2
The Bush Administration views democracy assistance as a key element of
its strategy to defeat terrorism. The Administrations Strategy for Winning
the War on Terrorism links inequities in political participation and the
lack of basic freedoms as a major cause of volatility leading to terrorism.
By promoting basic human rights, freedom of speech, religion, assembly,
press, an independent judiciary and other democratic rights, the United
States can help address some of the key issues within countries that can
breed discontent and lead to terrorism.3
There is, however, no one address within the United States Government for
democracy and governance programs. One recent study of these groups and
organizations identified over 20 such organizations currently operating
in the democracy promotion field.4 This number does not include the large
number of for-profit consulting firms and professional associations that
receive funding from U.S. governmental and non-governmental sources to
implement democracy programs overseas.
Diversity of Democracy Assistance Providers
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) plays a
major role within the U.S. Government in supporting democratic development
and good governance overseas. USAID has spent well over $9 billion over
the past two decades to promote democratic governance in more than 100
countries. One of USAIDs four overarching goals is Building sustainable
democracies. USAIDs provides over $1 billion in annual funding for democracy
and governance programs, the largest funder of such efforts within the
U.S. Government.
The Department of State is also active in democracy promotion efforts overseas.
The Bureau for Democracy, Human Rights and Labor (DRL) within the State
Department manages an annual portfolio of approximately $75 million for
human rights and democracy programs. The Office of the Middle East Partnership
Initiative (MEPI), established in 2002 within the State Departments Bureau
of Near East Affairs, has funded more than $300 million of programs that
support political, educational, economic and womens rights reform in the
Middle East region.
The Department of Justice promotes the rule of law in foreign countries
through its International Criminal Investigative Training Assistance Program
(ICITAP). ICITAPS mission is to serve as the source of support for U.S.
criminal justice and foreign policy goals by assisting foreign government
in developing the capacity to provide professional law enforcement services
based on democratic principles and respect for human rights.
The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) was created in 1983 as a private,
nonprofit organization to strengthen democratic institutions around the
world. The NED receives an annual appropriation of over $ 70 million from
Congress and is governed by an independent, nonpartisan board of directors.
The NED provides direct grants to support pro-democracy NGOs and civil
society organization in Africa, Asia, Central and Eastern Europe, Latin
America, the Middle East, and the former Soviet Union. The NED also provides
core funding to four U.S. NGOs involved in democracy work the National
Democratic Institute (NDI), the International Republican Institute (IRI),
the American Center for International Labor Solidarity, and the Center
for International Private Enterprise. Both NDI and IRI are associated with
their respective political parties and work primarily to strengthen political
parties and processes in a number of different countries.
A relatively new actor in democracy promotion efforts is the United States
Congress. In 2005, the House of Representatives created the House Democracy
Assistance Commission to promote strong and effective democratic legislatures
in many different parts of the globe. This non-partisan Commission is made
of up twenty members of the House and is chaired by Representative David
Price of North Carolina. Representative David Dreier of California is the
ranking minority member of the Commission.
The Commission currently has 12 country partners Afghanistan, Colombia,
East Timor, Georgia, Haiti, Indonesia, Kenya, Lebanon, Liberia, Macedonia,
Mongolia and Ukraine. The Commission provides technical expertise to enhance
accountability, transparency, legislative independence, and government
oversight in the legislatures of these countries through peer-to-peer interactions
between Members, officers, and staff of the House of Representatives and
Congressional support agencies and members and staff of partner parliaments.
Another relatively new organization within the U.S. Government that supports
democratic and economic development overseas is the Millennium Challenge
Corporation (MCC), created in 2004. It is designed to provide direct foreign
aid and budget support to countries that demonstrate progress on democratic
and economic reform. The MCC rewards governments that perform well on measurements
of democratic and economic development by making substantial sums of money
available to those countries and giving those countries much of the authority
for implementing an agreed upon reform program.
USAIDs Approach to Democracy and Governance
USAID defines its democracy and governance programs as technical assistance
and other support to strengthen capacity of reform-minded governments,
nongovernmental actors, and/or citizens in order to develop and support
democratic states and institutions that are responsive and accountable
to citizens.5 USAIDs democracy and governance framework focuses on four
key dimensions of democratic development:
- Promoting Justice and Human Rights through the Rule of Law
- Strengthening the Institutions of Democratic and Accountable Governance
- Expanding Political Freedom and Competition
- Engaging Society through the Voice, Advocacy, and Participation of Citizens
A review of USAID funded programs from 1990 through 2003 indicates that
the largest percentage of funding went to strengthening civil society,
followed by governance programs, rule of law, and elections and political
processes.
USAID implements its democracy and governance programs primarily through
a network of field missions and staff in over 80 countries. Democracy programs
in these countries are normally designed and managed by experienced democracy
officers based on their knowledge, experience, and relationships in their
particular country. These programs are implemented by a wide range of U.S.,
international, and local organizations that are often based in-country
and provide long-term, continuous support and assistance to citizens, institutions,
and organizations engaged in democratic reform and transition.
The Office of Democracy and Governance, established in 1994, serves as
USAIDs focal point for democratic development. The Office of Democracy
and Governance provides technical leadership, research and analysis, and
training on democratization trends and practices and conducts assessments
and evaluations of democracy and governance programs in order to improve
the effectiveness of USAID democracy assistance.
The Office of Democracy and Governance has developed a framework for assessing
and designing democracy and governance strategies in emerging democracies.6
This strategic assessment framework provides a political analysis of the
country which enables USAID to design democracy and governance programs
that are specifically targeted toward assisting that country in addressing
the key political and developmental challenges in its transition to and
consolidation of democracy. The core of the framework is to examine five
key elements or variables of democratic development as follows:
- Consensus;
- Rule of Law;
- Competition;
- Inclusion; and
- Good Governance.
By analyzing these key variables, and by defining general democratic goals
and objectives, USAID is able to develop unique strategies by which to
design programs and approaches that effectively utilize USAID resources
to achieve those democratic goals and objectives.
Evaluating the Impact
USAID recently commissioned an outside, independent study of the impact
of U.S. democracy assistance on democracy building worldwide. The study,
entitled Effects of US Foreign Assistance on Democracy Building, was conducted
by Vanderbilt University and the University of Pittsburgh. The study found
measurable impacts on the rate of democratization in the world from 1990
through 2003, using Freedom House and other measures of democratization,
as a result of USAID democracy assistance efforts.7 In its final report
the committee said:
How much of this growth in democracy world-wide has been the result of
U.S. foreign assistance? The study found consistent and clear positive
impacts of foreign assistance on democratization
. Using the most widely
used measures of democracy
it was determined that USAID Democracy and
Governance obligations have a significant positive impact on democracy
. Spending on the promotion of democracy, in the period 1990-2003, helped
to increase democracy above the levels that would have been achieved based
on all other factors that could reasonably be expected to have mattered.8
The study also found that, in addition to the positive impact of overall
DG assistance on overall democratic development, certain sub-sectoral DG
assistance programs also had positive impact on their corresponding sub-sector
indicators. Specifically, USAID programs to develop media, civil society
and elections and political processes had a positive impact, respectively,
on the indicators measuring the level of development of media, civil society,
and elections.
Strengthening Parliaments and Legislatures
USAID is especially active in the area of legislative strengthening and
is the lead agency within the U.S. Government in this field. It currently
sponsors, or has recently sponsored, legislative strengthening activities
in over 60 countries. During the past 25 years, USAID has allocated over
$235,000,000 for the purpose of assisting legislatures in countries making
the transition from authoritarian to democratic rule to more effectively
perform their fundamental tasks of representation, lawmaking, and oversight.
USAID delivers the bulk of its legislative strengthening assistance through
U.S.-based implementing organizations or through local organizations in
the countries receiving assistance. These organizations work directly with
members and staff of parliaments and legislatures in newly democratic countries
to assist those institutions to become more effective and efficient through
a mix of technical assistance, exposure to comparative practices, skills
enhancement and training, and the development of legislative and information
technologies. Legislative strengthening programs are normally designed
to achieve the following objectives:
- Building support for democratic reform within a legislature
- Increasing representation of citizens
- Improving technical capacity in policy and lawmaking
- Enhancing oversight of the executive branch
- Ensuring sound management and adequate infrastructure
USAIDs Office of Democracy and Governance provides technical assistance,
guidance, training, and advice on legislative strengthening activities
and strategies. The Office publishes various technical publications concerning
legislative strengthening9 and has sponsored two international conferences
on legislative strengthening.
Legislative strengthening programs have produced significant results in
a number of countries. For example, the Frost Task Force program in the
early 1990s was targeted at strengthening the new democratic parliaments
in Eastern Europe. This program introduced information systems, increased
staff capacity, and improved legislative infrastructure and helped to modernize
and transform many of those legislative institutions from authoritarian
model rubber-stamp institutions to active, more representative, democratic
institutions. This assistance, implemented by the Congressional Research
Service, was especially successful in helping to create stronger legislative
institutions in Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic.
A specific example of how USAIDs legislative strengthening assistance
actually works can be found in Niger. Assistance in that country focused
on improving committee processes and committee hearings and increasing
public input and participation in the legislative and policy-making process.
USAID assistance supported a country-wide public hearing process on the
topic of decentralization and local government reform. Over 30 town hall
meetings were held, attended by a total of approximately 15,000 people.
The input provided through these town hall meetings resulted in significant
changes by the National Assembly to the governments decentralization plan.
In Mozambique, USAID assistance to the Mozambique National Assembly in
the late 1990s focused on improving the quality of policy research and
analysis available to members of the National Assembly. Partly as a result
of these efforts, the number of legislative initiatives emanating from
within the National Assembly as a percentage of overall legislation enacted
increased, demonstrating increasing autonomy and effectiveness in lawmaking.
Similarly, the percentage of draft laws proposed by the executive into
which the National Assembly provided substantive input increased from 50%
in 1996 to 100% in 1999 and 2000; in other words, every piece of legislation
proposed by the executive received serious scrutiny from the National Assembly,
thereby again demonstrating increasing autonomy and effectiveness in lawmaking.
USAID legislative strengthening programs are unique in that they provide
long-term, hands on technical assistance and training to legislative institutions.
Evaluations of past legislative assistance programs have found that although
programs like the Frost Task Force program have had significant impacts
on the infrastructure and information needs of legislatures, the programs,
in and of themselves, were insufficient to ensure long-term sustainability
of program results. These studies concluded that additional long-term technical
assistance in the form of a broader mix of activities including training
for members and staff, expert advice on legislative practice and procedures,
policy reform, and linkages to other development programs and activities,
among others, are necessary to sustain long-term democratic reforms and
legislative effectiveness.
In addition to increasing the capacity of legislative institutions, USAID
programs are also increasingly focusing on improving the role and effectiveness
of the broader legislative community in the legislative process. Consequently,
legislative strengthening assistance often includes increasing the ability
of advocacy groups to participate in legislative proceedings, broadening
citizen access to and interaction with the legislature, improving media
coverage of legislative proceedings, and enhancing the capacity of think
tanks and academic institutions to provide in-depth information and policy
analysis in the legislative process.
Conclusion
The Bush Administrations request for democracy promotion funding in Fiscal
Year 2008 is over $1.5 billion. It is expected that future U.S. administrations
will also make the promotion of democracy and good governance overseas
a critical element of U.S. foreign policy. Whether those administrations
will support these policies with the same level of funding remains to be
seen.
Notes
1. Advancing Canada's Role in International Support for Democratic Development,
Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development,
July 2007.
2. Second Inaugural address, January 20, 2005:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/01/print/20050120-1.html
3. White House release of updated strategy, National Strategy for Combating
Terrorism, September 5, 2006 at:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nsct/2006/sectionI.html
4. The Democracy Bureaucracy: The Infrastructure of American Democracy
Promotion, Thomas Melia, A discussion paper prepared for the Princeton
Project on National Security Working Group on Global Institutions and Foreign
Policy Infrastructure, 2005, see:
http://www.wws.princeton.edu/ppns/papers/democracy_bureaucracy.pdf
5. At Freedom's Frontiers: A Democracy and Governance Strategic Framework,
USAID, December 2005.
6. Conducting a DG Assessment: A Framework for Strategy Development, USAID,
November 2000.
7. See Finkel, Steven E., Aníbal Pérez-Liñán, and Mitchell A. Seligson,
Effects of U.S. Foreign Assistance on Democracy Building: Results of a
Cross-National Quantitative Study, USAID-University of Pittsburgh-Vanderbilt
University, 2006, available at:
http://www.usaid.gov/.... Among the many findings of the study is that USAID democracy assistance
has a clear and positive impact on democratic development as measured by
leading indicators of democracy. For example, $10 million of USAID DG
funding in a country would produce an increase of one-quarter of a point
(.25 units) on the 13-point Freedom House democracy index in a given year,
or about a five-fold increase in the amount of democratic change that the
average country would otherwise be expected to achieve in any given year.
8. Id. at Executive Summary, pages 1-3.
9. See, for example, Handbook on Legislative Strengthening, USAID, February 2000.
|