PDF
Gary Levy
Real Power to the People: A Novel Approach to Electoral Reform in British Columbia
Real Power to the People: A Novel Approach to Electoral Reform in British
Columbia by R. B. Herath, University Press of America, Lanham Maryland,
2007
This book adds to the growing literature on the British Columbia Citizens'
Assembly on Electoral Reform. The recommendation of the Assembly favouring
adoption of the Single Transferable Vote system was narrowly defeated when
it failed to reach the 60% threshold for success imposed by the government.
Much of the book is devoted to the background and setting up the assembly,
the random selection process, the learning phase, the public hearing phase,
and the deliberation phase all of which are readily available in other
publications and on the website of the assembly. The detailed discussion
of arguments for and against proportional representation and the advantages
and disadvantages of the various systems are also well known.
What makes this book unique is that the author was a member of the Citizens'
Assembly. He is even more unique in that he is one of only two Assembly
members who had been active in politics having led a political party in
his native country, Sri Lanka. He is also a poet, a dramatist and holds
a Ph.D in organizational behaviour. He admits he was an outspoken proponent
of the Multi Member Proportional system but for the most part does not
allow his personal preference to colour his analysis.
Not surprisingly the author is a great supporter of the Citizens' Assembly
process but in the last two chapters he identifies several shortcomings
with the process as it was used in BC. These have all be noted by others
but his perspective as a former member of the Assembly, is particularly
useful.
These problems can be described as follows:
-
Mandate restrictions: The Assembly was prevented from recommending a larger
size for the legislature or making any changes other than the way members
are elected. The Assembly was also forced to recommend only one alternative
to the status quo.
-
External Influences: He thought there was an over dependence on external
academic experts and an unwillingness to listen to individuals with experience
in practical politics.
-
Insufficient attention to public opinion. During the consultations phase
the vast majority of individuals and groups who made representations to
the Assembly favoured MMP but they were often dismissed as interest groups
who would benefit from the system they were proposing.
-
Incomplete analysis of the options: During the deliberation phase the
MMP model was not developed or considered to the same extent as the STV
model, mainly due to time restrictions.
-
Combining the referendum with the general election: This may have saved
money but it meant the electoral debate was overshadowed by the election.
It also encouraged politicians to avoid taking a position a which might
alienate one group or the other.
-
Inadequate public funding: No money was allocated for informing the electorate
about recommendations of the CA before the referendum
Despite these problems the author hopes that other jurisdictions use Citizens'
Assemblies to consider electoral and indeed other difficult policy matters
that elected politicians are loath to tackle.
The author does not consider one rather dubious aspect of the Citizens'
Assembly process that was present from the very outset. This was the idea
that the choice of an electoral system is a question of "values". Of course
different electoral systems that have different characteristics but these
are not values in any meaningful sense of that term.
We would be much better advised to think of an electoral system as simply
the plumbing, not the heart and soul, of our democracy. Given the right
conventions, the right institutions, and a proper sense of honesty and
probity there are half a dozen electoral systems that are perfectly satisfactory.
An obsession with values undermines one of the real virtues of democratic
politics, an openness to comp- romise.
It should not take a Citizens' Assembly, a referendum and years of debate
to decide the kind of plumbing we need in our house. What we need is political
leadership that would make use of existing Citizens' Assemblies, commonly
known as parliament and legislatures, to deal with the issue of electoral
reform.
Gary Levy
Editor
Canadian Parliamentary Review
|